Cigale Literary Magazine
Circa 2014
Cigale Literary Magazine, online literary magazine, was founded in 2011. This was its website.
Content is from the site's 2014 - 2015 archived pages offering a glimpse of what this site offered both authors and readers.
In 2017 on the Cigale Literary Magazine the following post was made: The magazine will soon be gone, but it has been archived at web.archive.org.
Enjoy the nostalgic trip back to the Winter 2014 Issue.
+++
“…the whole history of literary fiction as an evolutionary process may be said to be a gradual probing of deeper and deeper layers of life. … The artist, like the scientist, in the process of evolution of art and science, is always casting around, understanding a little more than his predecessor, penetrating further with a keener and more brilliant eye.
~ Nabokov
Cigale Literary Magazine was founded in September 2011 as an online literary magazine to publish the works of new and existing authors.
Cigale is a quarterly online literary journal featuring powerful new voices in the genres of short fiction, flash fiction fiction, and literary criticism/reviews. We look for writing that portrays the intricacies of character set against the landscape of a wider world, prose that looks out rather than in. We are dedicated to the continuity of art as a tradition, to literature that aesthetically explores universal themes: through innovation, through allusion, through metaphor. Works that are mindful of the writer’s role in a greater human conversation will find their home at Cigale.
Scott Bryson (Editor)
Scott Bryson is a graduate of Indiana University with a double major in history and religious studies. He is a haiku poet and is currently working on a book of urban haiku. He is also currently a Master's student at the University of Illinois - Springfield.
Winter 2014 Issue
January 15, 2015

Wailing Men Clasp Hands (Ink on Paper) © 2014 Allen Forrest
Cigale's Winter issue features works from the following authors.
Short Stories:
Robert Sobel - The Old Familiar Roar
Flash Fiction:
Erika Bradbury - Split Ends
Susan Dale - Spring's Compulsions
Leonard Owens III - On Your Mark, Get Set or One, Two, Three
Iaian Smallwood - Jumping Before the Bulls
Literary Criticism/Reviews:
Art Edwards - The Pot Calling the Kettle Narcissistic
Art Contributions:
Allen Forrest
+++

As a fledgling writer, I have always found Cigale Literary Magazine to be a source of inspiration - I look to new writers for role models. I love that the editor, Scott Bryson is a haiku poet. I read all his work and found his link to the insult haiku by Rev Sale to be incredibly entertaining. Another post that has stuck with me is by Sidu Ya which is basically a philosophical treatise on gambling. I love how it starts as review of an online casino, but quickly turns into a series of life lessons learned from losing at slots, poker, etc. where the real truth of wagered dreams is obscured by disappointment. I completely identify with this approach to a life view where realism is never something you can take for granted but in the moment you may be greatly entertained by some distraction that may appear more meaningful than it is. It's not whether or not you agree, but whether the perceived distraction reveals something about you that in the end you recognize and accept. [Trish Eden]
The Old Familiar Roar
Robert Sobel
There’s a suited man standing in front of Mickey’s. This hasn’t happened before. But there’s a man in a suit now, standing there, contemplative, looking up at something—the sign, presumably. I watch the man from the lot.
I feel as though I am only noticing the sign for the very first time myself. There it is. Mickey’s. I seemed to only half-notice the thing before this moment. And now I notice it in the full, notably because I’m watching a man watch it. This has solidified the sign somehow.
Mickey’s Bar and Grill.
The suit doesn’t seem to fit the man quite right—bedraggled in a way, drooping over him, melting over his shoulders. The suit seems sand-scattered from this brief distance, spittle of white here and there, an old suit on an old man. He is like Travis from that odd film I saw at one point, an amnesiac man in a suit in the desert, alone. And here he has come, to Mickey’s, on a whim perhaps, on a confused route, ruminating a pint of the finest draft.
The beard is what stirs me. Rabbinical, messianic. A bearded man at the entrance of a pub, looking up. At a standstill. I watch and I can see him clearly, staring upwards at the sign.
And I wonder why he’s here. What is he wondering? What is he looking at? Is he looking at the sign at all? Or are his eyes only hovering there, looking blankly, and he is in fact only seeing the makeup of his mind? What happens when our eyes are set on something and we do not see it at all? Instead we see the dreamy substance, the brain-mush, sometimes a thing, an image, impossible to recall. And then, of course, what we are looking at finally comes in focus again, suddenly, and we come awake, things come to life—a sign is there.
There is amber in the beard; I feel that I can sense this color from here. He doesn’t wear a hat like Travis from that odd film I saw at one point, but I wish he was. A red hat would look good above that amber-hued beard. It hangs quite low, unkempt, twirling bright beneath the bar-neon.
He reminds me of a professor I had. He was only there my freshman year. Professor Fazzione. A well-bearded Italian. He sounded heavily accented at times, deeply paesano, yet he also spoke with some kind of clarity, an academia bent, the words sounding of world renown. He would stroke his beard at all times. He wouldn’t only stroke it mid-thought, as many believe bearded men do; he stroked the beard consistently, absentmindedly, at all times, and it became a fact of the man, an idiosyncrasy accepted. Like a good friend’s twitch, it becomes a part of your day, without hindrance.
You look forward to Italian cinema, at least if you have a heart. He would stroke the beard looking behind him at the screen, pause the film, thrusting out his entire body—a quiet width to him, stalwart, always suited—begging the screen to pause. He would press the pause button every time as if he didn’t trust it. He trusted his own soul and body more than the remote to put a stop to a scene, to freeze us at the perfect placement. A millisecond off and he would try again, the great body-thrust pause.
He felt forced into teaching us Neorealism. “How do you not know of this?” he would say, stroking his beard with a remote in the other hand. “You,” he’d say to someone, “Speak. Say one thing.” And we’d all laugh. “They tell me teach you Neorealism. You are to know this, they say to me. It is a freshman class. Teach them Neorealism and this is all. DeSica. Ladri di Biciclette. Of course. What else? You should be teaching this to yourselves. I should have you watch these films and that is all. Hand in a final paper. But, I must teach Neorealism. OK. You. What is Neorealism?”
I tried hard to be great in his class. He felt like a great man. I didn’t like my timidity, but it was everywhere, hounding my body, making my cheeks red in class in tormented anticipation, getting called on, what a primitive and simple thing to worry over. “You.” A heart-wrenching word that fateful year. All of us could have been “you.” Some took it in stride, providing detailed answers. How did they do it? Professor Fazzione stroking the beard and patting a student on the shoulder. I tried hard for that pat. I wanted to be great in that class. He was a great man.
It was only a matter of time before the “you” was addressed to me. He asked me what a jump-cut was, something I believed to know. But my answer was a string of words, just these words, not quite my own, words levitating above me somewhere just out of my control. But it was my mouth they were coming out of. “A jump-cut is…well, I mean. Like in The Wild Bunch. Peckinpah.”
“A film historian!” he would shout out when anyone brought up a title on their own. And then he’d respond with a title himself, saying: “Godard. Breathless.”
I remember one class when we received graded midterm papers. Fazzione didn’t like having many grades. A midterm and a final. This was it. And attendance. He wanted your ass in the seat. He wanted the full forty “yous.” I made sure I saw the almost incomprehensible red letter on a shaggy haired student’s returned paper to my right, a well-spoken kid. When he was a “you” for the day he always had an answer, even when he didn’t have one. Words. They flowed out of him like a current. Great words; dichotomy, meta-filmic, reactionary, understated, catharsis. How was he able to use these words on the spot, called on? And correctly. Where does this vocabulary come from with nearly no concentrated thought?
He received a C – on the midterm. I received an A –.
He sensed me, Fazzione, back there. He sensed my face getting hot. Making the back of my hand cool on the metal parts of the desk, bringing them to my face in a moment’s swipe, a quick coolness, a momentary peace. I saw his glances, stroking his beard. I was the “you” in the back who received the highest grade on the midterm. I felt the days going by slowly, the impending force of his verbal onslaught. The smirk almost concealed in the beard, directed at me out the corner of his eye.
I was so nervous I decided to go to his office instead, to break the tension, imbue a dialogue, get words out there in the open, in a twosome. It would have been the next two classes, irrefutably, and I just didn’t have the stomach for it, the imminence of the doom finally forcing me to do something.
His office was perched up in an already perched up building. Old concrete steps led the way in what felt like a loop, an unforgiving journey circling me onward. I took steps, some short, some long, and would find my back actually to the building in which I journeyed towards. At times I could see where I began, amazingly below, deeply distanced. Students milled about at the trough of this mountain, and their youthful words and bodily sounds became indistinct at some point. I paused on this hill, this mound, this whatever, and felt I could still hear them, the backpacked and the anguished, the Docker’d and sun-dressed, silenced by my perched distance. They were still speaking, of course, still laughing and joshing youthfully, still making sounds of vomit near, their Nikes and sandals still landing in clacks and pounds. But I couldn’t hear them anymore.
I remember a gust of wind coming along and feeling, for a second, I was going to be pummeled down the hill by the force. I had nothing to hold on to, another fifty steps to go roughly, the old brick building awaiting a willing child, the dire youth, the apprentice. “Make this trip at your own risk,” the journey seemed to imply, “Only come if you are serious; if you cannot make it to the top then you are unworthy of our advice, our teachings.”
During the final stretch I took the steps cautiously. The more I neared the more the building seemed to be empty. Maybe it was only the sky that day, grayish-silver, a nothing sky. I approached to the sound of gusting wind, as if whistling to my arrival, my hand nearing the door handle. I let myself in the main entrance and walked down a tight dark hallway and thought of how wonderful a steadicam shot would look at that very moment, tracking with me, in noirish twilight.
I was nervous at the prospect of knocking, let alone finding the words to speak, when I arrived at his door.
Dr. Fazzione, Film Studies.
I heard the clacking of keys from inside, fingers punching away. I’ve wondered if he sensed me out there, if he sensed me all the way at the bottom of that hill. I believe he felt and heard each step I took. He is a man who senses these things.
I knocked on his door powerfully; I decided that if this must happen it must happen with vigor. I knocked a powerful three count, and the keys kept on clacking inside.
Yeeeesssssss, he said as he continued typing, and I opened the door with as much willed confidence as in my knocks and entered the space.
There were the books. And there was the man. The somewhat dirtied suit. The hair upon hair. Hair reached around this guy, curled, tumbled, fell, swooped. The man didn’t have hair; hair was the man.
And then he stopped at once and turned in the same instant, the keys chatter stopping amazingly fast, and the man was looking me in the eyes. Ahhhhhh, you, he said.
“Dr. Fazzione, Hi.” He offered me a chair and I took a seat; I needed to sit desperately.
“I see you have made it up the hill.”
“Yes. Yes, I have. What a trek.”
“How can I be of assistance?”
I remember the way he swiveled in the chair, a left to right bounce, his back falling and rising in a constant rhythm.
“I don’t know how to speak in class,” I said to him bluntly, awkwardly. “I don’t know how to form words. I feel stupid next to all of these students.”
And he clapped his hands, once, a loud clap, and then he presumably went back to stroking his beard. “Who knows how to speak?” he said. “Nobody knows how to speak. Some know how to pretend to speak. This is all.”
“How do you pretend to speak?” I asked him.
“You pretend,” he said. I thought about this and it seemed to be the greatest answer imaginable. I felt relieved from it.
“Your paper. I was very impressed. You write somewhat flowery. But, you know, it was fun flowery. Fun flowery I can like sometimes.”
“I don’t feel smart, professor. I hear these students speak…they’re just—”
He threw up his hands in a wave of sorts and let them fall back down tiredly. “My child.”
I thought he was going to say more but he seemed to eagerly wait for me to speak. I decided to lean on the side of full non-disclosure.
“I sit in the library sometimes, professor…a lot of the times. A lot of the time, I mean. A lot of the time? Anyway, I make the decision that I will pull an all nighter to learn. I will read an entire book, I tell myself. I buy a coffee and pick out a book. Quentin Tarantino: The Cinema of Cool. I read that last night. I inhale these books and feel like I’ve gotten nothing out of them. What do I have to say about them? I can’t articulate it. But I read every single word.”
“I never did see Pulp Fiction,” he said to me that day in his office.
“You’re kidding… I could lend it to you.”
“No, no. See… once I watch that film there will just be a new film that I haven’t seen that
I should have already. Do you see? There will be a new film that will hover over me. Let it be Pulp Fiction. I say that I haven’t seen Pulp Fiction and then that is the end of the discussion. We talk about something different. You understand? That is the cycle. Ladri di Biclicleta. The cycle of life. It’s all a bicycle wheel. Everything.”
“How do you explain the other students, professor? Honestly. The kid to my right. With the hair. He speaks so well.”
“He will be a CEO. Do you want to be a CEO?”
I didn’t have an answer to this. I imagined myself three-pieced, spruced and silhouetted against a skyscraper window, looking out. Chief Executive. The thought wasn’t all so bad and it hurt to think that Dr. Fazzione had already given up on me becoming a CEO.
He must have noticed me thinking deeply here because he stopped swiveling and coughed. He leaned forward in thought a moment, stroking the beard. He leaned back and surprisingly put his hands behind his head for a couple seconds before retaining normal position and swivel. He was building paragraphs in his mind, finding words, readying himself to speak.
“The Old Familiar Roar,” is what he said. It felt like a title. I enjoyed the words. They fit well next to one another. Though, of course, I didn’t know what he meant by them. “The Old Familiar Roar,” he said again.
He wanted to hear a reaction of sorts from me. “What does this mean,” I said.
“It is the title to my war novel. And its adaptation.”
“You wrote a war novel? And there’s a film?”
“It’s from a Hemingway short story. Rather famous. ‘The Snows of Kilimanjaro.’ But the phrase is just this phrase, embedded in one of those Hemingway sentences. So small. The same size as all the other words, naturally. The old familiar roar. No, this is the title to the war novel I wish I could write. But I can’t.”
“What do you mean?”
He leaned close. “I don’t know enough to write it.” He leaned back and took a deep breath, smirking, as if he were outside breathing in a beautiful day’s air, somewhere in Sicily maybe, some garden somewhere across the water on the great boot. “If I ever re-read that line,” he said, “I may just drop dead on the spot. Morto. At once. To see those words in its original sentence. I’ve said these words out loud to myself every day for the last thirty years. The Old Familiar Roar. It is my war novel. It is the war novel I will never be able to write.”
I fell into a swoon here, weighing what had been said. I began to think about what book I would read that night. What information I could pack into the brain. I saw myself up in a high window, a suit tight around my muscles.
“You have seventy more years to live,” Fazzione said at that moment, and it was as if he heard my thoughts. To this day that is the most shocking thing anybody has ever said to me.
And the suited man is missing. He isn’t there any longer. But where has he gone? How did my eyes not see it? My eyes are still fixated on the front of Mickey’s, but it is without a suited man now. The man simply disappeared before me. What was I watching this whole time? My eyes haven’t moved, but I never saw him leave. Or did he enter?
Rob Sobel is a graduate of James Madison University with a degree in English. He is currently working on his MFA, in fiction, at Fairleigh Dickinson University. His short story "Palsied" was published in the Lunch Ticket literary magazine.

Split Ends
Erika Bradbury
It was the beginning of the sun. I watched the light fill her room, inch by inch. It creeped up the legs of her chair, then the body, and passed onto the white wall of her bedroom. I wanted to touch it. There’s something about the warmth it creates on my strands, it makes me glow on the outside like a chain of gold. But I’d never been able to will my human to do something that drastic. I was latched by my roots to her scalp and the light was a good five feet from my location. Maybe if it was five inches away, I’d be able to coax her…
So I watched it climb the wall until the entire room felt some extent of the sun shine. This was usually when her alarm would buzz and she’d wake up. Not every sun was like this, but I’d say a good five suns in a row started off this early. The longer she spent awake during the moon, the later she’d rise during the sun. That was a pretty reliable occurrence.
The alarm sounded and her hand scratched at some of my follicles. She turned it off and began to rise. As her head lifted from the pillow, my body dragged along: a prisoner to every movement of her cranium. I could tell she wasn’t too pleased to be rising, not just because I could read her thoughts as they streamed, but because she grumbled and moaned a bit. Some emotions were easily decoded from verbal cues, although growing from her scalp did give me direct access to her mind and how she was feeling. My human did not like the early sun.
I had a lot of length back then. My strands flowed to the middle of my human’s back and were the color of the rich brown soil that held grass in place. I always thought it strange that my human would invite company over for me, but she’d do this on a regular basis. I’d see the likes of sprays, lotions, and other sticky substances that reeked like soggy lilac bushes. I never enjoyed their stay. Thankfully they weren’t usually over too long; the synthetic rain my human stood under every night chased them away.
Along with having the putrid company visiting occasionally, my human would submit my body to different restraints. Shiny, sparkly, extravagant little things were often used to hold sections of my strands securely. They’d sit all gaudy-like on top of me. The bigger ones, like bows and flowers, were quite the embarrassment. I felt extremely awkward when we’d pass other humans who did not restrain their tresses. My kind never openly conversed with each other, but we could sense the other’s feelings from about 5 feet away. Mostly I’d register a sense of pity from them on the days where I held the more extravagant restraints.
On almost no occasion did I feel the need to converse with my kind. Sometimes my human would get very emotional if she hadn’t spoken with a friend or her boyfriend for a while, and I couldn’t quite understand that feature. My kind is very different. We are mostly introverted creatures of observation, and would rather live in silence, watching our surroundings and listening to our human’s think.
There was one instance, however, that made me wish I could reach out to another. It was as if this particular thought needed to be released so badly that I felt it would hatch out through my follicles. I needed to know if I was different from the others. Something unfamiliar was starting to claim a part of me.
I had thought I was going to live out my passive life submitting to the demands of my human, with not much more than strange company or restraints as the extent of my excitement. There were a few times I was able to will my human awake because her dreams were not very pleasant, and another where I managed to inconspicuously release a small restraint that I wasn’t too fond of. And these moments and others alike were exciting to me. But I had never truly known what excitement was…
Until I fell in love.
Erika Bradbury is currently a senior, graduating in May from Illinois State University with a degree in University Studies. Some of her work is published in ISU's journal called Euphemism, and can be seen in volume 9 issue 2 under "Poetry."

Spring’s Compulsions
Susan Dale
Life budding and expanding. Arrays of stars tossed by the fistful of night … to the moon‘s obsession. The earth rotating to conception and birth. To the ocean’ currents heaving to roll in, roll over, roll out. This is April’s promise. Again, until tomorrow, it will be kept. Earth’s renewal: a vow that moved Rita and David in the winds ferocity.
‘Throw yourself into spring’s impulsiveness! Miles of sand are stretched out before you. Waves crash the shore: upsurges of foam: volumes of crescendos.
In the trees, myriad nests are woven through; in and out, and around. From swollen buds, emerge fleshy flowers from which bees dip and nestle. Rhubarb stalks push up from a strained earth cracking open … to carpets of flowers. Flowers, so many, so lush, they are falling over themselves. Willows of pale green fronds, ferns unfurling: all are springing forth under buckets of rain nourishing a fecund earth.’
Caught up, they were to be whisked away by an April compulsion that grasped them in its feroicities.
************
Achingly-helpless to desires swelling within, spring pushed off her winter lover: old now and melting. Spurned and furious, he stormed off in one last, gusty, fare-thee-well. Bolts of lightening being the swords he thrust into the sky. Bellowing from shore to water, he swirled and surged the currents into surly surf that stormed the shore, even as he wept tears of rage. Fervently, futilely, did he wish that, but once more, he could be like the young lovers he watched romping on shore.
He sent forth battalions of tempestuous winds to taunt the lovers: naked, as they ran across the shoreline. He spun their bodies together in this raw-new night: a spring crescendo of wild winds and white sands. He churned the waters to wash over them with curls of foam. The lovers, a pink and gold goddess arching under a dark force. She felt that it was the black night itself that mounted her.
Clinging; one into the other, they undulated, unable to break apart. Yet fused, unmindful of the pouring rain beating down on them, uncaring of the waves washing over them. It seemed to Rita and David that they were being returned to earth’s earliest womb: a cavern of darkness and waters.
Susan Dale's poems and fiction are on Hurricane Press, Ken *Again, Penman Review, Inner Art Journal, Feathered Flounder, Garbanzo, and Linden Avenue. In 2007, she won the grand prize for poetry from Oneswan.

On Your Mark, Get Set or One, Two, Three
Leonard Owens III
It's midnight on July fourth. The only reason I'm parking my car at the all-night CVS across town is because my girlfriend keeps complaining about her back, a bruise and scrape caused by a drunken slip on the pool deck at a party earlier.
She laughed it off then. She cursed me out when I left our apartment.
She wants Advil. Name brand. Not generic. I am buying the generic. She will not bitch.
I won't let her see the bottle. I'll cup two pills in one hand, glass of water in the other, give her both, she'll slurp 'em down, go to sleep none the wiser, and that'll be that.
Unless she looks close at the pills. Then I'm fucked.
***
There's a lumpy white woman talking into her flip phone, face worn as a crusty towel.
“Where are you?... Me? The same place I was fifteen minutes ago. Standing out front of CVS... Come on, I got cold food... Because you said you'd be right back when you dropped me off. You're the one that asked for the damn Rocky Road, anyway, and you know it's twice as expensive here... God. Just hurry up.”
Some kind of piece of shit on the other end of the line.
Her mini-cart overflows with food, powdered donuts and chocolate peanuts and Ding Dongs, and of course the ice cream. No loaf of whole grain bread or a granola bar. Her legs look out of juice, stiff. I wonder how many times she's switched her weight from the right leg to the left and back again. Or why she doesn't just lean against the wall.
***
For a place with pharmacy on the sign, CVS sure does like to keep all the medicine tucked in the back.
I see a face. Girl whose name I don't know and probably didn't know back in the day either. She has the look on her face that I have on mine: How do I know this person? Every ghost I see around town is from high school. At least that's what I tell myself.
If she's a high school ghost, she looks the same, I think, only sluttier. Then again, it's the fourth, so I shouldn't hold excessive titty-display against her. The six pack of Smirnoff Ice in her hand, well, I can't overlook that level of piss-poor taste. Bad call, whatever your name is from wherever my mind remembers you.
There it is, just like I told her. Advil: $7.49. CVS Ibuprofen: $4.49. That's three fucking dollars, almost a gallon of gas. I keep telling her. I keep trying. It's all I can do.
***
A tall, skinny mixed girl bounces by the counter. Maybe ten years old, surely no more than twelve. She's wearing light-up shoes, the kind I begged my parents for but never got. Short pink shorts. Hair in two tails, like her favorite Brady girl is Cindy. She's chunking out words to the cashier through a smile, but I don't catch exactly what it is. Either “on your mark, get set, go!” or “one, two, three, go!” Let's say it's “one, two, three, go!” I don't like the other one so much. But it could've been that one. Who knows.
Anyway, she keeps panting. “Come on, just say it! Just say it.”
The cashier, a slim black guy with a sharp-ass goatee, is steady shaking his head.
I point at her with a finger-gun. “One, two, three, go!”
Her eyes glow before she darts down the aisle, hundred miles an hour, heels blinking red with each step.
“Hey, big man. That's all for you?”
“Yep, that's it.” He scans the Ibuprofen.
“She yours?” I thumb toward the girl.
“Nah, ain't mine.” He laughs.
“Her mom around here somewhere?” I swipe my card. Push in my pin.
“Don't know.” He hands me the pills.
“How long she been here?” And then my receipt.
“Least an hour. Was here when I started my shift. Been bugging me all night.”
“That's shitty.”
“Yeah, yeah it is.” I don't think he knows what I mean.
When I walk out, I see the girl. On the shoe-scuffed tile floor, limbs sprawled out, panting and huffing and smiling, not a care in the world, or a parent.
***
“Hey, need a ride?”
“No. He'll be here soon.”
“What'd he say? How long?”
“Twenty minutes.”
“How many times you call?”
“Four.”
“How long you been waiting here?”
“Almost an hour.”
“Did he tell you twenty minutes all four times?”
“Yeah.”
“Fuck him. Let's go.”
I gesture that I'll push the cart to my car, and she lets me.
I debate asking her what kind of person goes grocery shopping in the middle of the night. On July fourth. At CVS. But I don't. I just drive until she says this is it.
***
“These aren't Advil! They're not the right fucking color, Martin.”
“Yeah, be glad it's not melted ice cream.”
“What the shit is that supposed to mean? Fucking ice cream.”
I stare at the bathroom mirror, counting the toothpaste spit marks.
She shakes the bottle in my face. “I don't want these. I want Advil. I'm not worth three fucking dollars. I swear, you just don't love me, do you?”
I point at her with my finger-gun. “On your mark, get set...”
Leonard Owens III is an undergraduate student at The University of North Florida, where he majors in English with a double-minor in Creative Writing and Literature. When class isn’t in session, he works as a writing tutor, which allows him to hone his passion for teaching and pay his bills on time. Though he hasn't been writing long, he's been fortunate enough to have several pieces of poetry and short fiction published online and in print. More of his writing can be found at lfoiii.blogspot.com.

Jumping Before the Bulls
Iaian Smallwood
Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. That’s the sound of the train. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Carrying us across the country.
“Where we headed?” Mack says aloud.
“Memphus I think,” Bo says.
“Didn’t we just come from there?”
“Quiet. I’m tryin’ to sleep,” Packie says. His voice is just barely heard over the sound of the train. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk.
“We headed to Kansas City,” Ray answers with a grin. “I got me a girl in KC.” His yellow teeth shine in the moonlight.
We’ve opened the doors in order to cool off. Our musk still lingers in the car. We had to leave the doors shut all day, but at night we can keep them open. It’s harder to spot us at night.
I sit with my head resting against the steel, looking at the moving ground below. I like watching the earth move. What’s funny is that I’m moving and it’s standing still, but it looks the other way around. That’s how the world works. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk.
“Hey, hey,” Mack asks Ray. “Wasn’t we jus’ in Kansas City?”
“Naw. That was Jefferson. Don’t be thick.”
I came on in St. Louis, just before Jefferson City. It was night. I was running for my life. Down the gravel paths between the trains, trying to find an open car. When you stop in a city, you have to get out of the cars, or hide so they don’t get you. The bulls. The meanest sons of bitches on this earth. God created them for one reason: find the drifters and beat the hell out of them. About four of them rushed into the car we were all hiding in. My buddy Taco (who I was riding with since Little Rock) and I ran out, one came charging after us. We split up. I haven’t seen Taco since.
I ran and ran. My lungs burned from the air I was gulping down. I thought I was dead for sure. Until I spotted another open door, and Mack’s head popping out.
“When we gonna be in Chicago?” Mack asks no one.
“You on the wrong train if you goin’ to Chicago,” Bo says.
“Will you shut up?” Packie lifts his head. “I’ll throw you out this train.”
Mack laughs. “You hear him? Listen to him.”
“Packie mad. Packie mad,” Bo teases.
Mack joins in.
“Hey quite. Or they’ll hear us,” Ray says. That’s impossible over the train. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk.
The two quiet down anyway.
Then Mack says to Bo as soft as he can. “When we gonna be in Chicago?”
Bo laughs and shakes his head. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk.
Jefferson City. St. Louis. Louisville. Nashville. Memphis. Little Rock. Atlanta. Montgomery. Baton Rouge. New Orleans. Shreveport. Dallas. Houston. Austin. I’ve been all across the bottom half of the country, and there is nothing to find. I can’t think Chicago has what Mack is looking for. Or any of us. We’re just deadwood. Drifting on a steel river from town to town.
I think about Melissa. This girl I used to know. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk.
“Hey. Psst. Fish. Fish.” Mack calls out to me. They named me Fish. I don’t know why. Maybe because I’m the new one. A rite of passage.
“What’s that, Mack?”
“Where’s you headed?”
“I don’t know. West, I guess.”
“Where’s you comin’ from.”
I didn’t understand him. “I jumped on in St. Louis.”
“Nah. Where’s you comin’ from? I’s from Georgia. Bo from Missuhsippi. Who the hell know where Ray from. KC I suppose. And that white devil Packie from up North. Wisconsin or somethin’,” he says in a bad accent.
“Austin originally. But I left a long time ago. I’ve been all over the South.”
“You ain’t find no place to stay put yet?”
“Well, I had work in New Orleans for a while. And then I didn’t. So I’ve been going around looking for work.”
“The Depressin’ came. We went,” Mack smiles.
“Wouldja shut it?” Packie hollars. Upsetting everyone in the car.
Mack puts his fingers to his lips and winks.
The Depression came. And we went.
But where? What are any of us doing except running around, jumping before the bulls come, trying to find that next train, hoping it takes us to a place we can call home. But what is home to the homeless? We’re drifters. Roaming around on this stuck earth. Everyone else is planted where they stand, and we move all around them. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk. Ker-dunk.
Iaian Smallwood lives in Los Angeles, doing what one might imagine people in Los Angeles do: work in television, have big dreams. She works in production for FX network. When she's not working she splits her time between reading and writing, and gallivanting around town. She is currently toiling away at my first novel. An excerpt was published in the Belmont Literary Journal.

The Pot Calling the Kettle Narcissistic: The Lives and Works of John Updike and David Foster Wallace
Art Edwards -Consider the Lobster, a collection of David Foster Wallace’s nonfiction writing, contains his review of John Updike’s Toward the End of Time, “Certainly the End of Something or Other, One Would Sort of Have to Think.” In it, Wallace charges that Updike, among other faults, writes about the same protagonist over and over again—all “clearly stand-ins for Updike himself”—and that the protagonist is “always incorrigibly narcissistic, philandering, self-contemptuous, self-pitying … and deeply alone, alone the way only an emotional solipsist can be alone.”i Having just finished Wallace’sInfinite Jest, these claims struck me as more than a little hypocritical, so much so I wrote a review of Wallace’s review, calling him out for this incongruity and defending what I think is exemplary in Updike’s work.
I then continued my education in Wallace by working my way through D.T. Max’s biography of the authorEvery Love Story is a Ghost Story, and I also reread Updike’s memoir Self-Consciousness. The result of these excursions has me even more struck by the symmetrical relationship these two writers share. In particular, their lives and works seem like bookend reactions to the last half of 20th Century America, Updike wide-eyed and smitten with the possibilities of mass capitalism and culture, Wallace trapped by the knowledge of what such a system had done to his generation of writers, and to himself.
Anyone who takes a stroll through Self-Consciousness--especially its first long chapter “A Soft Spring Night in Shillington”—can’t help but be taken by Updike’s easy love for his hometown Shillington, Pennsylvania. America was on the cusp of one of its trademark corporate expansions, and with lines like “I was a devotee to packaging,”ii Updike may well have been the target market for forties-era companies looking for a foothold. There is almost no Updike novel where the protagonist doesn’t at some point marvel at the little things such a life brings: the sleekness of a car’s fender, the satisfying crunch of corn chips, the elastic band of underwear. To read Updike going off about the pleasure he got as a child from things like the local variety store is to read someone besotted. “There were cases of such bygone candy as coconut strips striped like bacon and belts of licorice with punch-out animals and imitation watermelon slices and chewy gumdrop sombreros.” iii As an adolescent, Updike loved to go to the movies, to fundraisers to help the war effort, even to the doctor. His feelings about public school seem to sum up his view of his childhood in general: “I could not understand how anybody could rebel against a system so clearly benign.”iv
It was a world view that encouraged a sort of entitlement, which the author reveals in comments like: “Since childhood I have been a late sleeper, preferring to let others get the world in order before I descend to it.”v We’re left with the sense of someone who thinks the world will continue to spin in a way that will take care of him. Such comments also reveal a man who relies on the women in his life to deal with his domestic situation, to “wear the pants in the family,” as his own mother had. If Updike believed in a god giving order to things like his beloved hometown, as much of Self-Consciousness contests, that god may have been wearing a dress.
Updike was so under the spell of his country, he had a notorious blind spot for a time when its motivations may have been less than savory. I'm referring to his famous marginal support of U.S. involvement in the war in Vietnam. In the Self-Consciousness essay “On Not Being a Dove,” Updike explores how he came to “such an awkward pass”vi that led to him being out of step with his colleagues, the crowd at Martha's Vineyard, his then-wife. Seen through the context of Updike’s “benign” view of the place he called home, it’s not hard to imagine all this testiness over the war getting under his skin. “That, perhaps, was what angered me most about Vietnam; it made it impossible to ignore politics, to cultivate serenely my garden of private life and printed artifact.”vii Pulled out of his bucolic dream of his homeland, Updike had to wrestle with the disruption to his paradise. He even wonders, when remembering a man who'd suggested Updike's photos showed evidence of a too-contented life, “Had I suffered enough?viii Was his blind trust in the intentions of his country a sign that he really didn't understand the plight of the South Vietnamese?
I had been lucky and, as the lucky will do, had become hardened. I had been the apple of my parents' eyes. Our Shillington arrangements, precarious though they felt, had skirted disaster. I had avoided fighting in a war or incurring a fatal disease. I had not broken a bone until I was forty and could view it as a humorous exercise in machismo. I was spared appendicitis until I was fifty and could make an epiphanic short story out of it. I held the whip hand in the romantic relationships of my life and brought all heartbreak upon myself. No plane had crashed with me in it ... ix
America was, for Updike, a safe haven, and to defend her, even in her atrocious moments—especially!—was his only way of paying back in kind.
After reading Every Love Story is a Ghost Story by D.T. Max, the first published biography of David Foster Wallace, it’s not hard to imagine Wallace’s frustration with Updike's brand loyalty.Max pulls from a Wallace letter the pique Wallace felt while reading Updike’s prose, that it, in Wallace’s memorable trope, “paws … at the reader’s ear like a sophomore at some poor girl’s bra.” Updike’s comfort with his country, his work, within his own skin, bugged the younger author deeply. Having committed suicide at 46, they were comforts Wallace would never know.
He wasn’t always so torn. In fourth grade, Wallace wrote in an autobiographical sketch, “Likes underwater swimming football, TV reading.”x It was television, that staple of Wallace’s generation of Americans, that would lead to a lifelong addiction and a great deal of conflicted feelings for the writer. His childhood involved spending hours watching shows likeStar Trek, Guiding Light andThe Price is Right.xi But by the time Wallace went to college at Amherst in Massachusetts, the mixed feelings television brought with it for him had set in. In his dorm’s communal TV room, Max writes Wallace “enjoyed Hawaii Five-Oreruns and … Hill Street Blues,” even though “In general he did not like being watched watching, and if others were there he’d pass by.”xii Later, in his twenties, amidst a deep depression after becoming a creative writing instructor at Amherst, Wallace admitted to watching six to eight hours of television a day xiii. TV was no doubt a slightly less damaging form of indulgence than the alcohol and drugs Wallace consumed at the time, but, he seemed to suspect, no less depleting of his soul.
In his long essay “Fictional Futures and the Conspicuously Young,” written not long after his Amherst teaching days, Wallace began to understand the debilitating force TV had on him and his generation of American writers. “For us ... TV’s as much a part of reality as Toyotas and gridlock. We quite literally cannot ‘imagine’ life without it.” xiv
But TV was more than just a barrier to original thought for Wallace. It was analogous to the booze he drank or the marijuana he smoked. Max writes, “America was, Wallace knew, a nation of addicts, unable to see what looked like love freely given was really need neurotically and chronically unsatisfied.” xv Wallace’s classic novel Infinite Jest divides the brunt of American culture between the novel’s two main settings: the Enfield Tennis Academy, where, Max writes, “the best players are trained to satisfy, through their tennis games and commercial endorsements, the appetite of the consumerist culture they came from” xvi; and the halfway house Ennet House, where “addicts are not being cultivated to feed America’s obsessions; they are the people who’ve OD’d on them.”xvii Wallace’s America was a machine that created two kinds of people: those who could tranquilize through entertainment, and those tranquilized. Despite his own commercial success, Wallace quickly found he wanted nothing to do being the former. Even before Infinite Jest came out, the author had already bowed out of the spotlight as much as possible. He wrote to a student at the time, “[Celebrity life is] not for me, simply because it’s low-calorie and unstimulating and also highly narcotic.”xviii
Wallace was as committed as he could be to combatting his nation’s addiction to addictions. Around the time of Infinite Jest’s publication, he championed a more moral fiction, one that didn’t rely solely on dramatizing “how dark and stupid everything is.” He continues: “In dark times, the definition of good art would seem to be art that locates and applies CPR to those elements of what’s human and magical that still live and grow despite the times’ darkness.”xix
These differences between Updike’s and Wallace’s points of view could easily be written off as differences in emotional makeup—and they were distinct in this regard—but others could have been more circumstantial. While neither writer went into the military (Updike was 4Fed for psoriasis, to his dismay; it’s hard to imagine Wallace ever seriously entertaining the idea of the military), their respective eras’ prevailing attitudes toward war were quite different. Updike was a boy when World War II started, and echoing that time, he seemed never to doubt the goodness and rightness of his country’s participation. Wallace’s infancy took place in the sixties, and gone was the sense that America’s participation in a war was beyond reproach. While Wallace might not be the first person we think of as espousing sixties ideals, his condition seems a natural intellectual reaction to the decade, rejecting what his culture gave him on instinct, trusting little but what he could come up with on his own, as outside of his country’s insidious forces as possible.
It wasn’t until well after the sixties that Updike could, in the essays of Self-Consciousness, admit some of the fallacy of his own knee-jerk sentiments about the era. As the world has only gotten more dominated by screens that fill viewers with neurotic need, it’s hard to imagine Wallace recanting his skepticism of American mass culture as expressed in Every Love Story is a Ghost Story. One can be grateful he’s not around for its latest escalation, and that his work is still here to help combat it. -
i David Foster Wallace, Consider the Lobster (New York: Back Bay Books), 53.
ii John Updike, Self-Consciousness (New York: Ballantine Books), 9.
iii Updike, Self-Consciousness, 9.
iv Updike, Self-Consciousness, 14.
v Updike, Self-Consciousness, 2.
vi Updike, Self-Consciousness, 122.
vii Updike, Self-Consciousness, 134.
viii Updike, Self-Consciousness, 157
ix Updike, Self-Consciousness, 158.
x D.T. Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story (New York: Viking), 4.
xi Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 6.
xii Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 21.
xiii Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 104.
xiv Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 110.
xv Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 156.
xvi Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 161.
xvii Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 161.
xviii Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 179.
xix Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story, 215.

Crossing Fingers
Cynthia Miles
When I learned that my brother had started to do google searches for tips to stop drinking, I crossed my fingers and hoped he found something new that would give him enough hope to try it, whatever that “it” would be. Having several unsuccessful treatments at rehab centers and failing miserably at 12 step programs that require abstinence like AA, I didn’t hold out much hope for success. But here he was, once again attempting to look for a solution. A week later I got a call telling me he had signed up at an online site called LifeBac that helps people who want to cut back their drinking and take control before they slide into alcoholism. LifeBac was not a rehab or treatment clinic, but a collection of modern, science-based tools to empower people like himself. The drug they prescribe is called baclofen. “Look it up”, he wrote.
I did and what I discovered was rather interesting. First of all, it has not yet received approval by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) as a safe and effective treatment for alcohol or drug use disorders. Oh dear. However, for a number of years, doctors in Europe have been prescribing baclofen as the primary treatment for people who drink excessively. AND preliminary open-label studies from Italy demonstrated effectiveness of baclofen in reducing alcohol use among the alcoholics. In addition, results from a clinical study conducted by Brown University show alcohol-addicted participants receiving baclofen were able to abstain from drinking for longer periods of time than those who didn’t receive the drug. That all sounded promising. However.. Baclofen use has been associated with certain side effects. When prescribed for alcohol dependence, side effects associated with baclofen included fatigue, sleepiness, insomnia, dizziness, paraesthesia, nausea, vomiting, sensory alterations, sexual changes (decrease or increase of libido), various forms of pain (including headache), bowel disorder (diarrhea or constipation), dysphoria, weight loss or gain, and memory loss, among others side effects. Don’t you just hate reading about a drug’s side effects. It doesn’t makes you want to take it at all. Baclofen’s effects on the brain’s chemical processes can also offset the effects of any other medications a person is taking. I asked my brother if he could even take the drug considering all the caveats about usage.
“No problem so far”, he wrote. “Baclofen does require titration which means I need to slowly increase the meds’ dosage until my cravings are completely removed or controlled. Keeping my fingers crossed. You know I am allowed to still drink!! Can you believe that?”
“Come on over and distract me.” He texted the next day.
I admit I was dubious. However, the LifeBac program offers regular online doctor's visits to tailor a plan specific to your individual circumstances along with follow up with in-app medication reminders and check-ins.
Six month’s later, my brother’s excessive drinking has ceased. He still has an occasional beer and a glass of wine at dinner, but no binge drinking, no need to run to the nearest bottle of booze whenever something goes wrong. He seems so much happier. I don’t know what to say, other than I hope he remains on this trajectory. Time will tell, is a trite expression, but seems appropriate here.
I should write a short story and submit it to Cigale, but of course that is no longer possible. I always enjoyed your authors’ work.
Spring 2014 Issue
March 31, 2014

Untitled (Photograph) © 2013 Laura Story Johnson
Cigale's Spring issue features works from the following authors.
Short Stories:
Reece Choules - Tonight the Streets Are Ours
Murli Melwani - The Village with Gandhi's Statue
Joseph Pravda - A Snare in Vellum
David Seguin - I Changed My Mind
Flash Fiction:
Dr. Maitreyee Joshi - An Antithesis
Jhaki M.S. Landgrebe - Tiramisu + Math
Connor Madigan - Bushido
Christine Tierney - Flish’s Filthy Fish Bowl
Daniel Waters - The Most Interesting Pictures
Literary Criticism:
Chelsey Clammer - This is Running for Your Life: A Critical Review
Donald Dewey - The Fiction of Non-Fiction
Art Contributions:
Laura Story Johnson
Previous Issues
Summer 2014 Issue (Vol. 3, Issue 2)
Spring 2014 Issue (Vol. 3, Issue 1)
Winter 2013 Issue (Vol. 2, Issue 4)
Fall 2013 Issue (Vol. 2, Issue 3)
Summer 2013 Issue (Vol. 2, Issue 2)
Spring 2013 Issue (Vol. 2, Issue 1)
Winter 2012 Issue (Vol. 1, Issue 4)
Fall 2012 Issue (Vol. 1, Issue 3)
Summer 2012 Issue (Vol. 1, Issue 2)
Spring 2012 Issue - Debut Issue (Vol. 1, Issue 1)
Cigale Literary Magazine is currently open to submissions. We accept short stories, flash fiction, and literary criticism/reviews.
Cigale is seeking contributors for a forthcoming literary blog. If you have ideas and would like to submit posts around 500-1000 words on an occasional or regular basis, query reviews [at] cigalelitmag [dot] com .
Short Stories and Flash Fiction:
Literature is the centuries-long process of mining the human condition, plunging deeper and deeper into the recesses of ourselves. Each work should be a further step in this journey, an attempt to illuminate another corner of life.
Submissions are not limited to any specific genre as great literature can transcend these categories. Simultaneous submissions are accepted but please let us know if the work appears in another published form.
Criticism:
Cigale accepts criticism on any subject. The only criteria are that the piece show deep prior reflection on some aspect of the human experience, is well-argued and stylistically engaging (no academic papers). Examples of great essayists whose work we admire: Elizabeth Hardwick, Susan Sontag, Margaret Atwood, Roland Barthes, Lionel Trilling, and Edmund Wilson.
Book Reviews:
To propose a book review, query submissions [at] cigalelitmag [dot] com with title of the work you wish to review and links to any previous reviews or other publications.
Guidelines:
- Flash Fiction - Max of 1,000 words
- Short Stories - Max of 6,000 words
- Literary Criticism - Max of 3,000 words
It is okay if the piece goes over the word count by a few words. Sometimes making the work shorter to fit the word count can detract from the work. Please try to stay close to the guidelines though.
Simultaneous submissions are acceptable.
Multiple submissions are acceptable.
Please email submissions to submissions [at] cigalelitmag [dot] com and type "Submission - Short Story (Flash Fiction, literary criticism, or artwork)" in the subject line.
You should attach the work as a .doc or .docx file. A biography is also helpful, but will be requested prior to publication.
Rights:
- We ask for first north american serial rights and archival rights. Copyright remains with the author.
Artwork:
- Please include a link to your work and state in your email if any works are not available.
More Background On CigaleLitMag.com
CigaleLitMag.com was the original online home of Cigale Literary Magazine, an independent literary journal founded in September 2011 to publish original fiction, flash fiction, literary criticism, and book reviews. The magazine provided a platform for emerging and established writers whose work examined human experience through compelling characters, distinctive prose, and thoughtful engagement with the wider world. During its active years, Cigale developed a recognizable editorial philosophy that emphasized literary craftsmanship, artistic experimentation, and the continuing relevance of literature as a means of understanding society and individual experience.
Operating primarily as a quarterly online publication, Cigale Literary Magazine belonged to a growing community of independent digital literary journals that emerged during the early 2010s. These publications made it possible for writers to reach readers without relying exclusively on traditional print magazines, commercial publishers, or established literary institutions. Cigale distinguished itself through its particular interest in character-driven storytelling, innovative approaches to familiar literary themes, and criticism that connected books with larger cultural and philosophical questions.
Although the original magazine eventually ceased publication, its work remains relevant to readers interested in contemporary short fiction, independent publishing, and the evolution of online literary culture. The website's surviving material provides an opportunity to revisit the authors, stories, essays, and artistic contributions that characterized the publication. Independent literary directories, contemporary reviews, writers' websites, and archived references also document Cigale's presence within the literary community.
Founding and Early History of Cigale Literary Magazine
Cigale Literary Magazine was established in September 2011, with its debut issue appearing in spring 2012. The publication initially followed a conventional quarterly literary calendar, releasing seasonal issues containing selections of original fiction and criticism. Its early development coincided with an especially active period for online literary publishing, when writers increasingly discovered independent magazines through submission directories, literary blogs, and social media rather than exclusively through printed publishing guides.
The magazine's editorial identity was built around the idea that literature should engage with the complexities of human existence rather than function merely as personal expression or entertainment. Its founding philosophy treated literary history as an ongoing conversation in which each generation of writers adds new perspectives, challenges inherited assumptions, and explores previously overlooked dimensions of experience. This approach encouraged writing that could be experimental in form while remaining connected to broader human concerns.
The earliest documented volume included four seasonal issues published during 2012, beginning with the spring debut and continuing through summer, fall, and winter. The quarterly pattern continued into 2013, with another four issues appearing in the magazine's second volume. Its archive also identifies spring and summer 2014 issues, along with a winter issue dated January 15, 2015. The numbering system reflected the publication's development over several years and made it possible for readers to navigate individual issues as parts of a continuing literary project.
An important independent record of the magazine's early activity appeared in July 2012, when NewPages, an established resource covering literary magazines and independent publishing, reviewed Cigale's summer issue. This coverage shows that the magazine had begun attracting attention beyond its own contributors and editorial circle during its first year of publication. The review discussed several individual stories and identified recurring themes involving illusion, perception, and characters confronting discrepancies between their expectations and reality.
Editorial Leadership and Scott Bryson's Literary Background
Scott Bryson served as editor of Cigale Literary Magazine and was closely associated with its editorial direction. According to the magazine's historical biographical information, Bryson graduated from Indiana University with a double major in history and religious studies. He was also a haiku poet working on a collection of urban haiku and, during the period described, a master's student at the University of Illinois Springfield. These academic and creative interests were consistent with Cigale's emphasis on cultural awareness, philosophical reflection, and precise literary expression.
Bryson's interests in history and religion offered an intellectual background for an editorial approach concerned with more than narrative technique alone. Cigale's selection criteria encouraged writers to consider how individual lives intersect with historical circumstances, social structures, moral choices, and larger questions about human identity. The magazine's preference for fiction that looked outward toward the world distinguished its stated mission from publications focused primarily on autobiographical experimentation or narrowly personal narratives.
Bryson also participated in the broader online writing community. In January 2014, writer Damyanti Biswas referred to an earlier interview with Bryson in which he discussed what influenced his decisions when selecting short stories for Cigale. This independent reference demonstrates that the editor was engaging directly with aspiring writers and discussing the practical considerations involved in literary submissions. Such participation helped connect independent magazines with writers seeking to understand editorial expectations and improve their work.
Publicly accessible historical records identify Bryson as editor, but they do not establish the magazine's complete legal ownership structure, corporate registration, financial backing, or the identities of any additional proprietors. Cigale is best understood as an independently edited literary publication rather than as a documented division of a major publishing company or university press.
Editorial Philosophy and Literary Goals
Cigale's defining philosophy centered on the belief that literary fiction forms part of an evolving artistic tradition. The magazine drew intellectual inspiration from Vladimir Nabokov's reflections on literature as a process of examining increasingly complex layers of life. Rather than promoting a narrow literary movement, the journal encouraged contributors to investigate universal themes through methods including metaphor, allusion, structural experimentation, and unusual perspectives.
A distinctive feature of its editorial outlook was the importance assigned to characters interacting with the wider world. The magazine sought fiction in which personal conflicts were connected to recognizable social, historical, psychological, or cultural conditions. A story about an individual's loneliness, for example, could become an exploration of modern relationships or social disconnection, while a narrative about a traveler might illuminate economic hardship, migration, or the search for belonging.
The publication also respected literary tradition without insisting that writers imitate established authors. Its stated willingness to consider work across genre boundaries reflected the conviction that strong literature can transcend conventional classifications. Literary experimentation was valued when it deepened the reader's understanding of a character or situation, rather than simply drawing attention to unusual techniques.
This balance between continuity and innovation was particularly important to Cigale's identity. The magazine welcomed both beginning writers and more experienced contributors, creating a space in which different levels of literary development could coexist. Its editorial approach suggested that the value of a story depended primarily on its insight, artistic execution, and ability to participate meaningfully in the larger literary conversation.
Publication Format, Website Navigation, and Reader Experience
CigaleLitMag.com functioned as an online literary magazine rather than a conventional publishing storefront. Its principal content consisted of seasonal literary issues, individual stories, criticism, contributor information, and submission instructions. Readers could explore the publication through issue listings and article pages organized around particular works and authors.
The magazine's primary content categories included short stories, flash fiction, literary criticism, book reviews, and visual artwork. Its historical website also maintained a previous-issues section, allowing visitors to identify earlier publications by season, year, volume, and issue number. This arrangement gave the digital magazine some of the organizational characteristics of a traditional print literary journal while retaining the accessibility of a web-based publication.
For writers, the submissions section was especially important. It explained the magazine's editorial interests, acceptable manuscript lengths, required submission formats, and publication rights. The site also invited proposals for a literary blog, indicating an interest in expanding beyond quarterly issues into additional discussions of books, writing, and cultural subjects.
Unlike a commercial publication selling subscriptions, merchandise, or literary services, Cigale's surviving pages emphasize creative work and editorial participation. There is no substantial evidence of a commercial product catalog, restaurant-style menu, paid membership program, or extensive advertising operation. Its main attraction was the literature itself, presented as accessible material for readers and as a potential publication opportunity for authors.
The Spring 2012 Debut and Early Contributors
The spring 2012 debut marked Cigale's entry into the independent literary publishing community. One writer who documented her involvement was Amanda Oosthuizen, whose short story "The Chair" appeared in the inaugural issue. On her own website, Oosthuizen explained that the story had previously been shortlisted for the Asham Award but remained unpublished until Cigale accepted it. She also described choosing the magazine because of its outward-looking editorial philosophy.
Oosthuizen's account provides useful independent insight into Cigale's appeal to contributors. "The Chair" explored a chance encounter between people from different circumstances and incorporated issues involving family separation, immigration, AIDS, aging, and the environmental consequences of the oil industry. These subjects aligned closely with the magazine's preference for stories that connected private experiences with significant social questions. The author's decision to submit the story also illustrates how a newly established online journal could attract work that had already received recognition elsewhere.
The example is significant because it demonstrates that Cigale's editorial ambitions were reflected in at least some of the work it published. The magazine was not simply accepting short fiction without an identifiable thematic direction; it actively presented itself as a place for narratives examining relationships between individuals and the societies they inhabit. The debut issue therefore helped establish both its literary priorities and its role as an accessible outlet for writers developing their publication histories.
Independent Recognition: The NewPages Review of Summer 2012
One of the clearest examples of independent critical attention to Cigale appeared on July 16, 2012, when NewPages published a review of the summer issue. The review identified illusion and the confrontation between expectation and reality as important themes linking several stories. This outside assessment is especially useful because it documents how a contemporary reader interpreted the magazine's editorial selections rather than relying exclusively on the publication's own description of its goals.
Among the stories discussed was Ivan Overmoyer's "The Bathroom Window," in which a narrator's imagined view differs from what is actually revealed. The reviewer also considered Ned Randle's "The Amazing Doctor Jones," a story about an older physician struggling to adapt to changes in medical practice, and Pan Pan Fan's "The Woman in the Mirror," which addressed illusion through the act of looking at a reflection.
The review placed Cigale alongside numerous other independent literary magazines receiving attention from NewPages, including publications with established audiences and recognizable editorial identities. For a new journal, appearing in this context represented meaningful exposure to readers who actively followed short fiction, poetry, and literary criticism.
Although this coverage does not establish Cigale's circulation, website traffic, or national popularity, it provides evidence that the magazine was sufficiently visible to receive an independent issue review during its inaugural year. It also offers a concrete example of the kinds of literary themes the magazine was publishing early in its history.
Growth Through the 2013 and 2014 Issues
Following its debut year, Cigale continued publishing seasonal issues and soliciting contributions from new writers. A July–August 2013 newsletter from the Writers' Alliance of Gainesville announced that the magazine was accepting submissions for its forthcoming September fall issue. The announcement included an August 23, 2013 submission deadline and invited short stories, short-short stories, reviews, literary criticism, and artwork.
This notice demonstrates that Cigale was promoting its submission opportunities through established writers' organizations as well as through its own website. Such outreach was an important way for independent online magazines to discover contributors beyond their immediate networks. It also suggests that the publication maintained an organized editorial calendar, with submissions gathered in advance of seasonal releases.
The magazine's spring 2014 issue, dated March 31, 2014, illustrates the breadth of its contributors and the balance it sought between creative work and criticism. The short-fiction selections included Reece Choules' "Tonight the Streets Are Ours," Murli Melwani's "The Village with Gandhi's Statue," Joseph Pravda's "A Snare in Vellum," and David Seguin's "I Changed My Mind."
The same issue featured flash fiction by Dr. Maitreyee Joshi, Jhaki M.S. Landgrebe, Connor Madigan, Christine Tierney, and Daniel Waters. Literary criticism appeared through Chelsey Clammer's "This Is Running for Your Life: A Critical Review" and Donald Dewey's "The Fiction of Non-Fiction." Visual artwork was represented by Laura Story Johnson, whose untitled photograph dated 2013 accompanied the issue.
This combination of short fiction, flash fiction, critical writing, and artwork demonstrates Cigale's multidisciplinary character. Although literature was its primary focus, visual contributions helped establish an aesthetic identity for individual issues and complemented the written material.
The Winter 2014 Issue and Its Featured Writing
The issue identified as Winter 2014, dated January 15, 2015, provides one of the most detailed surviving examples of Cigale's editorial selections. It featured a short story by Robert Sobel, flash fiction by Erika Bradbury, Susan Dale, Leonard Owens III, and Iaian Smallwood, literary criticism by Art Edwards, and artwork by Allen Forrest. Its visual contribution included Forrest's 2014 ink-on-paper work "Wailing Men Clasp Hands."
Robert Sobel's "The Old Familiar Roar" is a reflective story built around memory, perception, and intellectual insecurity. It begins with a narrator observing an unfamiliar man outside a bar before moving into recollections of a university film professor whose demanding personality profoundly influenced the narrator's thinking. The narrative explores academic self-consciousness, the desire for intellectual recognition, and the difference between genuine understanding and the appearance of expertise.
Sobel's story also draws upon cinema and literature, including references to Italian Neorealism, Jean-Luc Godard, and Ernest Hemingway. These references are integrated into a larger examination of artistic ambition and the difficulty of translating experience into meaningful creative work. The story exemplifies Cigale's interest in fiction that moves between personal circumstances and broader intellectual questions.
Erika Bradbury's "Split Ends" takes a more experimental approach by presenting its narrative through the perspective of human hair. The unusual narrator observes its human host, reacts to daily grooming practices, and gradually discovers emotions that complicate its passive existence. The story demonstrates the magazine's willingness to publish imaginative concepts that depart from traditional human-centered narration.
Susan Dale's "Spring's Compulsions" uses seasonal imagery, personification, and sensual language to explore renewal, desire, and the relationship between natural forces and human experience. Leonard Owens III's "On Your Mark, Get Set or One, Two, Three" presents a sharply observed nighttime encounter in a pharmacy, using colloquial dialogue and ordinary circumstances to examine relationships, compassion, and personal responsibility.
Iaian Smallwood's "Jumping Before the Bulls" follows itinerant train travelers during the Great Depression. Its characters move across American cities while confronting unemployment, homelessness, uncertainty, and the continuing search for somewhere to belong. The story's historical context and attention to marginalized lives closely reflect Cigale's preference for fiction that examines individuals within larger social circumstances.
Literary Criticism: John Updike, David Foster Wallace, and Art Edwards
One of Cigale's most substantial critical contributions was Art Edwards' essay "The Pot Calling the Kettle Narcissistic: The Lives and Works of John Updike and David Foster Wallace." The essay examined the complex literary and cultural relationship between two influential American writers whose careers reflected different attitudes toward consumerism, national identity, entertainment, and artistic responsibility.
Edwards began with David Foster Wallace's criticism of John Updike and developed a broader comparison between the authors. The essay considered Wallace's "Infinite Jest," Updike's autobiographical work "Self-Consciousness," and D. T. Max's Wallace biography "Every Love Story Is a Ghost Story." Rather than treating the writers simply as competing literary personalities, Edwards examined how their perspectives were shaped by the different historical and cultural environments in which they developed.
A central argument concerned Updike's relative comfort with American consumer society and Wallace's skepticism toward the psychological consequences of mass entertainment. Edwards connected their literary approaches with changing attitudes toward television, capitalism, war, celebrity, and artistic authenticity. The resulting essay presented literary criticism as an exploration of American cultural history rather than merely an evaluation of individual books.
Importantly, Edwards preserved a version of this essay on his own website, identifying its original appearance in Cigale Literary Review in 2015. This independent author-maintained record confirms that the publication's critical work continued to have a life beyond its original website. It also reinforces the importance of Cigale's criticism section, which offered readers extended arguments about major literary figures alongside original creative writing.
Submission Guidelines and Opportunities for Writers
Cigale Literary Magazine maintained submission guidelines that were relatively accessible to beginning writers while still establishing clear editorial expectations. Flash fiction was generally limited to 1,000 words, short stories to 6,000 words, and literary criticism to 3,000 words. The guidelines allowed some flexibility when exceeding a word limit slightly would better preserve the integrity of a work.
The magazine accepted simultaneous submissions, allowing authors to send manuscripts to other publications while awaiting an editorial decision. Multiple submissions were also permitted. These policies were significant for writers trying to build publication credits, since restrictive submission rules can require authors to leave manuscripts under consideration for extended periods without exploring other opportunities.
Manuscripts were submitted by email as Microsoft Word documents, typically accompanied by a brief biography or biographical information supplied before publication. Separate procedures applied to book review proposals and artwork submissions. Writers proposing reviews were encouraged to identify the book under consideration and provide examples of previous writing.
Cigale's rights policy requested first North American serial rights and archival rights while allowing authors to retain copyright. This arrangement followed a recognizable model within independent literary publishing, under which a magazine receives the right to publish a work initially and preserve it in an archive without acquiring full ownership of the author's intellectual property.
The publication also invited occasional or regular contributors to a planned literary blog, with proposed articles generally ranging from 500 to 1,000 words. This initiative suggested an ambition to build a more active literary community around the quarterly issues, although available records do not establish how extensively that proposed blog developed.
These guidelines are historically relevant but should not be interpreted as current instructions. Cigale is no longer an active submission venue, and its former editorial email addresses should not be assumed to accept new manuscripts.
Contributors, Artistic Diversity, and the Magazine's Audience
Cigale's contributors represented a mixture of developing writers, university students, experienced authors, and individuals working in other creative professions. The biographical notes accompanying the historical issues included writers associated with institutions such as James Madison University, Illinois State University, the University of North Florida, and Fairleigh Dickinson University. Other contributors brought experience from television production, literary journalism, and independent creative work.
This diversity helped create a publication whose stories approached human experience from different educational, professional, and cultural perspectives. Some writers experimented with narrative viewpoint and language, while others explored recognizable social situations, historical periods, or relationships. The magazine's criticism section likewise ranged from discussions of particular books to broader questions about the relationship between literature and society.
The intended readership was similarly broad. Cigale appealed to people interested in contemporary fiction, readers seeking unfamiliar literary voices, students studying creative writing, and aspiring authors looking for models of successfully published work. Literary critics and academically inclined readers could find material addressing established writers and philosophical questions without the rigid conventions of scholarly journals.
Because Cigale was distributed online, readers were not restricted by proximity to a particular bookstore, campus, or metropolitan literary center. Its potential audience extended across the United States and internationally wherever its pages could be accessed. However, there is no publicly verified circulation figure, subscriber count, or comprehensive traffic history that would justify describing the magazine as a mass-market literary publication.
Location, Geographic Reach, and Organizational Identity
Cigale Literary Magazine was identified in the Duotrope literary directory as a United States publication operating electronically on a quarterly schedule. This listing provides an independent confirmation of its national publishing context and basic format. The magazine's digital character meant that its audience and contributor network were not dependent on a particular physical distribution location.
Although editor Scott Bryson had educational connections to Indiana University and the University of Illinois Springfield, these affiliations do not establish that Cigale was headquartered in Bloomington, Springfield, or any other specific city. Publicly available records examined for this history do not conclusively establish a street address, formal office location, or university sponsorship.
The magazine is therefore most accurately characterized as a United States-based online literary publication with a geographically dispersed community of contributors. Its relationship to other literary organizations was primarily editorial and cultural rather than necessarily institutional. Writers' associations, literary directories, reviewing websites, and individual authors' platforms provided routes through which the publication reached potential readers and contributors.
Popularity, Reviews, Awards, and Recognition
Cigale achieved a measurable level of visibility within the independent literary community, although the surviving evidence does not support claims of major commercial popularity. Its inclusion in Duotrope, coverage by NewPages, promotion through a writers' association, and references on contributors' websites show that the magazine participated in a wider publishing network rather than functioning as an isolated personal project.
The NewPages review is especially meaningful because it evaluated an issue's literary qualities and discussed individual works. Amanda Oosthuizen's account of her debut-issue publication provides another perspective, showing that at least one contributor regarded Cigale's editorial philosophy as a reason to submit work. Art Edwards' subsequent preservation of his critical essay offers further evidence that contributors considered their appearances in the magazine part of their professional writing histories.
The magazine's contributors also brought accomplishments from outside Cigale. For example, Oosthuizen's "The Chair" had been shortlisted for the Asham Award before appearing in the inaugural issue. Historical contributor biographies also recorded other literary publications and distinctions. Such credentials demonstrate that Cigale attracted writers with experience or recognition beyond the magazine itself.
Nevertheless, there is no reliable evidence in the sources reviewed that Cigale itself won a major national literary award, maintained a large paid subscriber base, or achieved the commercial reach of leading literary magazines. Its reputation is better understood through the quality and range of its published work, its independent critical reception, and its contribution to the network of smaller literary journals active during the period.
Cultural and Social Significance of Cigale Literary Magazine
Cigale's significance lies partly in the kind of publishing opportunity it represented. During the early 2010s, digital literary journals increasingly challenged the idea that meaningful literary publication required access to an established print magazine or major commercial publisher. Smaller editorial teams could reach readers directly, provide opportunities for unfamiliar writers, and assemble issues around distinctive artistic priorities.
Cigale participated in this development while maintaining respect for traditional literary craftsmanship. Its emphasis on universal themes, character development, and meaningful criticism reflected a belief that digital publication need not mean abandoning established standards of literary seriousness. The online format expanded accessibility, while the editorial philosophy preserved connections with the broader history of literary art.
The magazine also encouraged forms of storytelling that reflected social and cultural experience. Its published fiction addressed subjects such as economic displacement, intellectual insecurity, interpersonal conflict, loneliness, love, and changing perceptions of reality. Literary criticism extended those concerns into examinations of consumer culture, national identity, and the relationship between writers and their historical environments.
Another important aspect was the opportunity to bring different artistic forms into conversation. Photography, drawing, literary essays, and short fiction appeared within the same publication, suggesting that Cigale understood literature as part of a wider creative tradition. This combination contributed to the magazine's identity as a cultural publication rather than simply a collection of unrelated short stories.
The End of Publication and Preservation of Its Archive
Cigale Literary Magazine eventually ceased operating as an active journal. Duotrope currently identifies the project as believed defunct, with October 2015 given as the relevant date in its listing. A later notice associated with the surviving website reported in 2017 that the magazine would soon disappear and that its material had been archived through the Internet Archive.
These records describe related but different stages in the publication's history. The Duotrope entry concerns its status as an active publishing project, while the later website notice concerns the continued availability and preservation of historical content. Neither necessarily establishes the exact date on which every original webpage ceased functioning.
The current CigaleLitMag.com presents historical material rather than operating as a continuing quarterly literary journal. Its surviving content includes information about the magazine's founding, Scott Bryson's editorial role, previous issues, selected stories, criticism, artwork, and submission policies. The website consequently serves as an introduction to the former publication and a record of the literary material associated with it.
The Internet Archive provides an additional means of investigating the magazine's historical development. Archived website captures can help researchers examine the original presentation of issues, historical navigation, and changes in the publication over time, although availability varies according to what was preserved.
Preservation is particularly important for independent online literary journals because their work can become difficult to locate after websites close, hosting arrangements change, or domain ownership transfers. Unlike printed books held in libraries, digitally published literary works may depend on a relatively small number of surviving copies. Cigale's surviving material therefore has value not only to former readers and contributors but also to researchers examining independent literary publishing during the early 2010s.
CigaleLitMag.com's Continuing Value to Readers and Literary Researchers
Today, CigaleLitMag.com is most useful as a historical record of a particular independent literary magazine and the creative community that developed around it. Readers can explore examples of fiction that were published during the magazine's active years, discover writers whose work appeared in its issues, and examine the editorial philosophy that guided its selections.
Aspiring authors may also find the former submission guidelines instructive. Although they are no longer operational, they illustrate how an independent literary journal communicated its preferences, established manuscript lengths, described publication rights, and encouraged contributors to think about the artistic purpose of their work. The guidelines are a reminder that successful submissions involve more than meeting a word count; they require understanding the publication's interests and producing writing that fits its intellectual and aesthetic direction.
For literary historians, Cigale offers a smaller-scale example of the digital transformation of literary publishing. Its archive documents how an independent journal combined quarterly editorial organization with open electronic distribution, public submission opportunities, and a willingness to publish unconventional work. The magazine's outside references also show how literary blogs, directories, and individual authors' websites helped circulate information about independent publications before more centralized digital publishing platforms became dominant.
Its legacy is not defined by a large commercial enterprise, extensive awards history, or enduring institutional sponsorship. Instead, Cigale demonstrates how a focused editorial vision could bring together emerging writers, experienced contributors, literary criticism, and visual art within a publication accessible to readers beyond traditional geographic boundaries.
Remembering Cigale Literary Magazine
Cigale Literary Magazine occupied a meaningful place in the independent online literary landscape of the early 2010s. Founded in September 2011 and publishing its debut issue in spring 2012, the journal developed a quarterly program of short fiction, flash fiction, literary criticism, reviews, and artwork. Under the editorial leadership of Scott Bryson, it promoted literature that examined character, society, history, and universal human concerns while welcoming both conventional storytelling and experimental approaches.
Its publication history includes independently documented recognition from NewPages, references in writers' association announcements, contributor accounts, and a continuing listing in Duotrope. The surviving issues demonstrate the magazine's range, from historically grounded stories and inventive flash fiction to substantial essays discussing major figures in American literature. Contributions by writers such as Robert Sobel, Erika Bradbury, Iaian Smallwood, Amanda Oosthuizen, and Art Edwards illustrate the different voices that found an outlet through Cigale.
Although the magazine is no longer accepting submissions or publishing new quarterly issues, CigaleLitMag.com continues to introduce readers to its former editorial mission and selected literary contributions. Its larger importance is as an example of independent digital publishing that treated literature as an ongoing cultural conversation and gave writers a place to contribute to that tradition.
